Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

340C – Prospective Legislation to Protect Federally Qualified Health Centers

Client Alert

Advocates for Community Health (ACH), an organization created to implement policy and advocacy initiatives for health care systems across the United States, has begun drafting legislation that is geared towards protecting Federally Qualified Health Centers (“FQHCs”) enrolled in the 340B Program, which is being dubbed “340C.”

The 340C program would be a separate drug discount program just for FQHCs and perhaps other entities such as rural hospitals and federal grantees like Ryan White Clinics as well. According to ACH: “[o]ur members and leadership came to the decision that health centers and the patients they serve must be protected as reforms to the 340B program are under consideration.”[1] The move seems aimed at distinguishing FQHCs and perhaps other federal grantees from hospitals that currently participate in the 340B program and that have drawn the criticism of some lawmakers.

The main goal of ACH is for funds from the 340B program to be reinvested into FQHCs to fully benefit the patients and communities they serve, as the program was originally intended. However, with 340B reform underway on the federal and state levels, ACH wants to make sure FQHCs are protected; “There is no defensible reason to sweep FQHCs into the ‘reform’ of the 340B program, particularly given that health centers are already required to reinvest any program revenue into patient services.”[2]

In particular, ACH lists three policy recommendations specific to FQHCs:

  • The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) should update its 2016 outpatient drug rule to clarify that states are permitted to reimburse above actual acquisition cost under fee for service Medicaid for drugs purchased under the 340B program at FQHCs, and provide a federal floor that supersedes state policy.
  • In order to preserve the essential savings provided by the 340B program, CMS and the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) must protect FQHCs against actual acquisition cost and/or forced carve-out policies within Medicaid managed care arrangements.
  • HRSA should establish additional requirements around entity burden reduction before approving manufacturer audits of FQHCs.[3]

When and if the legislation is introduced to Congress, we will update this Alert with more specifics as to what exactly the “340C” Program will entail.

If you have any questions about the 340B Program, please reach out to healthcare attorney, Member Daphne Kackloudis at dlkackloudis@bmdllc.com.

[1] Rita Rey, ACH Stands up to Defend the 340B Program for Health Centers, (Oct. 7, 2022) https://advocatesforcommunityhealth.org/ach-stands-up-to-defend-the-340b-program-for-health-centers/

[2] Id.

[3] Advocates for Community Health, “340B Policy Principles & Priorities,” https://advocatesforcommunityhealth.org/policy-advocacy/340b/.


Florida's Recent Ruling on Arbitration Clauses

Florida’s recent ruling on arbitration clauses provides a crucial distinction in determining whether such clauses are void as against public policy and providers may have the opportunity to include arbitration clauses in their patient consent forms. On March 6, 2024, Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeals reversed and remanded Florida’s Fifteenth Circuit Court ruling of Piero Palacios v. Sharnice Lawson. The Court of Appeals ruled that the parties’ arbitration agreement did not contradict the Legislature’s intent of Florida’s Medical Malpractice Act (the “MMA”), but rather reflects the parties’ choice to arbitrate claims entirely outside of the MMA’s framework. Therefore, the Court found that the agreement was not void as against public policy.

Corporate Transparency Act Update 3/14/24

On March 1, 2024, a federal district court in the Northern District of Alabama concluded that the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) exceeded Congressional powers and enjoined the Department of the Treasury from enforcing the CTA against the plaintiffs. National Small Business United v. Yellen, No. 5:22-cv-01448 (N.D. Ala.). On March 11, 2024, the U.S. Department of Justice appealed the district court’s decision to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.

The Ohio State University Launches Its Accelerated Bachelor of Science in Nursing Program

In response to Ohio’s nursing shortage, The Ohio State University College of Nursing is accepting applications for its new Accelerated Bachelor of Science in Nursing program (aBSN). Created for students with a bachelor’s degree in non-nursing fields, the aBSN allows such students to obtain their nursing degree within 18 months. All aBSN students will participate in high-quality coursework and gain valuable clinical experience. Upon completion of the program, graduates will be eligible to take the State Board, National Council of Licensure Exam for Registered Nursing (NCLEX-RN).

Another Transparency Obligation: The FinCEN Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Requirements

Many physician practices and healthcare businesses are facing a new set of federal transparency requirements that require action now. The U.S. Department of Treasury Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Requirements (the “Rule”), which was promulgated pursuant to the 2021 bipartisan Corporate Transparency Act, is intended to help curb illegal finance and other impermissible activity in the United States.

“In for a Penny, in for a Pound” is No Longer the Case for Florida Lawyers

On April 1, 2024, newly adopted Rule 1.041 to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedures goes into effect which creates a procedure for an attorney to appear in a limited manner in civil proceedings.  Currently, when a Florida attorney appears in a civil proceeding, he or she is reasonable for handling all aspects of the case for their client.  This new rule authorizes an attorney to file a notice limiting the attorney’s appearance to particular proceedings or specified matters prior to any appearance before the court.  For example, an attorney can now appear for the limited purpose of filing and arguing a motion to dismiss.  Once the motion to dismiss is heard by the court, the attorney may file a notice of termination of limited appearance and will have no further obligations in the case.